Who would want a painting made by a robotic? I’m uncertain, nevertheless whoever they’re, they merely spent an insane sum of cash to buy it.
“AI God,” is a painting that depicts famed cryptanalyst Alan Turing, and it was created by Ai-Da, who’s described on her website as being an “ultra-realistic robotic artist.” The work, which was purchased at Sotheby’s public sale dwelling in New York for over a million {{dollars}} this week, seems like this:
Ai-Da’s alan turing painting makes historic previous as first work purchased by humanoid robotic at @Sothebys https://t.co/GpVYt5tiBg pic.twitter.com/3KyqTXIVqJ
— designboom (@designboom) November 8, 2024
The Art work Newspaper writes that after 27 bids, the lucky winner walked away with the painting, having forked over higher than a million {{dollars}}.
Chances are you’ll find yourself questioning the way in which it’s even potential {{that a}} robotic might make a painting. Ai-Da’s web page states that she is “capable of [both] drawing and painting using cameras in her eyes, AI algorithms, and her robotic arm.”
Ai-Da, herself, is the work of Aidan Meller, who describes himself as a “specialist in fashionable and trendy paintings.” Meller has talked about that he created Ai-Da in an effort to encourage a dialogue about “the current obsession with know-how and its unfolding legacy.” It’s unclear who’s going to keep up the revenue from the “AI God” sale, Ai-Da or Meller.
Sotheby’s public sale dwelling launched a press launch, proper right here quoted by Barron’s, that acknowledged the sale: “As we communicate’s record-breaking sale worth for the first work by a humanoid robotic artist to go up for public sale marks a second inside the historic previous of latest and trendy paintings and shows the rising intersection between A.I. know-how and the worldwide paintings market.”
“Ai-Da’s portrayal of Turing not solely honors his legacy however as well as explores the broader, transformative have an effect on of know-how on human id, creativity, and firm, making her work an enormous milestone in every paintings and AI,” Sotheby’s web page states. Earlier this yr, Ai-Da exhibited AI God as “part of a five-paneled polyptych on the United Nations” all through a Geneva summit dubbed “AI for Good.”
After the sale of the piece, Ai-Da was quoted by Barron’s as saying: “The essential factor value of my work is its functionality to perform a catalyst for dialogue about rising utilized sciences.”
All of this type of begs the question: What’s that this for? Are people actually involved about searching for work “made” by robots? In that case, why? Personally, I’ve struggled to know the attraction of “paintings” generated by the use of software program program and {{hardware}}. Whereas the entire issue can’t help nevertheless actually really feel like a weird grift or opaque PR for the broader AI commerce.
